This editorial emphasizes that, during an epidemic, rapid mortality surveillance provides essential information to formulate an evidence-based response. Enumeration of all deaths, when compared to historically expected mortality, produces a picture of excess death, capturing both the direct burden of the epidemic and its indirect mortality burden, caused by disruptions to the access, use and provision of health care services. Rapid mortality surveillance can provide policymakers with up-to-date information about the epidemic’s spread into new areas or previously unaffected populations, and about the effectiveness of prevention and response strategies. Countries need real-time awareness of the distribution and magnitude of all direct and indirect health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Establishing, scaling and improving upon rapid mortality surveillance would contribute to fulfilling this need, as well as preparing for future outbreaks.
Recent Abstracts
Testimonials: Personal stories that have the power to save lives on the road
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Study on Lead Poisoning and Pollution in Indonesia
Improving Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems in French-Speaking Countries: Opportunities and Challenges
Strengthening the Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) System in Colombia
Estimation of the direct and indirect costs attributable to alcohol consumption in Brazil
Guidance for Collection and Processing of Cause-of-Death Data in the Civil Registration and…
Vital Strategies: Reimagine Public Health
Public perceptions of emissions testing in Jakarta, Indonesia
Cost-Benefit Analysis for Air Pollution Control Strategies in Jakarta
Key Messages on Alcohol Harms and Policy Solutions