This editorial emphasizes that, during an epidemic, rapid mortality surveillance provides essential information to formulate an evidence-based response. Enumeration of all deaths, when compared to historically expected mortality, produces a picture of excess death, capturing both the direct burden of the epidemic and its indirect mortality burden, caused by disruptions to the access, use and provision of health care services. Rapid mortality surveillance can provide policymakers with up-to-date information about the epidemic’s spread into new areas or previously unaffected populations, and about the effectiveness of prevention and response strategies. Countries need real-time awareness of the distribution and magnitude of all direct and indirect health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Establishing, scaling and improving upon rapid mortality surveillance would contribute to fulfilling this need, as well as preparing for future outbreaks.
Recent Abstracts
The Power of Storytelling: Guidance for the Creation of Testimonials
Lead Poisoning and Early Childhood Development
Prioritizing Evidence Gaps: Air Pollution and Health Impacts of Climate Action
Raising Alcohol Taxes to Reduce Harm: Fact Sheets for Brazil
Risk of mortality by aggression: A retrospective cohort study in women with notification…
How the Alcohol Industry Steers Governments Away From Effective Strategies to Curb Drink…
Analysis of the Efficacy of Alcohol Industry-Sponsored Drink-Driving Campaigns
Messaging Recommendations for Effective Road Safety Campaigns: Lessons From Formative Research for Drink…
Prescribing Psychostimulants for the Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorder: Navigating the Federal Legal…
Enforcement of COTPA in India- current status, challenges and solutions