In an online experiment (May-June 2023), Colombian adults were randomized to a nutrient warning, guideline daily amounts (GDA), Nutri-Score, or no-label condition (n = 8,004). Fewer participants (17%) exposed to the nutrient warning indicated they would purchase a high-sugar fruit drink compared to Nutri-Score (27%, Holm-adjusted (adj) p<0.001) and no label conditions (31%, adj p<0.001); there were no differences between the nutrient warning and GDA label (14%, adj p = 0.087). Compared to all other conditions, nutrient warnings were more effective at helping participants identify that products were high in nutrients of concern, were more effective at decreasing intentions to purchase these products of concern, and were perceived as more effective. Nutrient warnings were most often selected as the label that most discouraged consumption.
Published June 10, 2024
Sign up to receive our monthly Research Roundup email, which offers a selection of new public health research from major journals.
Recent Abstracts
Catalyzing Support for CRVS Improvement – Examples from the Data for Health Initiative
A Guide to Designing Contextualized Civil Registration and Vital Statistics E-Learning Courses
Guide to Developing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Civil Registration Using a Case-Based…
Building Safe and Healthy Communities
Uncovering the Hidden Risks of PM 2.5 Exposure Among School-Aged Children in Jakarta
Foundations & Futures: Reimagining Public Health in the Artificial Intelligence Era
Strengthening Health Systems to Address Air Pollution in Ethiopia
Policy Brief: Childhood Blood Lead Surveillance in Indonesia – Findings and Policy Recommendations
Impact of Blue Lanes on Road Safety: Crashes, Speed and Motorcyclists’ Perceptions in…
Impacto da Faixa Azul na Segurança Viária: Sinistros, velocidade e percepções de motociclistas…