In an online experiment (May-June 2023), Colombian adults were randomized to a nutrient warning, guideline daily amounts (GDA), Nutri-Score, or no-label condition (n = 8,004). Fewer participants (17%) exposed to the nutrient warning indicated they would purchase a high-sugar fruit drink compared to Nutri-Score (27%, Holm-adjusted (adj) p<0.001) and no label conditions (31%, adj p<0.001); there were no differences between the nutrient warning and GDA label (14%, adj p = 0.087). Compared to all other conditions, nutrient warnings were more effective at helping participants identify that products were high in nutrients of concern, were more effective at decreasing intentions to purchase these products of concern, and were perceived as more effective. Nutrient warnings were most often selected as the label that most discouraged consumption.
Published June 10, 2024
Sign up to receive our monthly Research Roundup email, which offers a selection of new public health research from major journals.
Recent Abstracts
Relatório de Atividades 2025 – Brasil
Mais Dados Mais Saúde – Percepções da população brasileira sobre fatores de risco…
What Primary Care Records Reveal About Cancer Signs and Symptoms
O que os prontuários da atenção primária revelam sobre sinais e sintomas de…
CRVS Performance Measurement and Monitoring Resource Kit
Model Kentucky Ordinance Establishing a County Opioid Abatement Advisory Council
The invisible pain: Gaps in Brazil’s public health system data on Menstrual and…
Exploring the Interface Between Birth Registration and Citizenship Determination: A Scoping Study in…
A dor invisível: lacunas nos dados do SUS sobre dor menstrual e pélvica
Catalyzing Support for CRVS Improvement – Examples from the Data for Health Initiative