Abortion safety has historically been conceptualized from a purely biomedical (clinical and public health) perspective and relied on clinical process measures (method, provider and setting) for classification. This operationalization required that the abortion involves a recommended method delivered by an appropriately trained provider, in an appropriate facility, to be considered “safe.” However, the updated 2022 WHO abortion guidelines consolidated the current evidence and best practices for provision of quality abortion care, which, for the first time, include self-management of medication abortion as a fully recommended model of abortion care. This article discussed limitations of the usual approach to the measurement of abortion safety, highlighted the required reclassification of self-managed abortion as “safe,” and called for a new paradigm to emerge for the measurement and understanding of global abortion experiences that is centered in a rights-based conceptualization of quality care for all abortion experiences.
Recent Abstracts
Testimonials: Personal stories that have the power to save lives on the road
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Study on Lead Poisoning and Pollution in Indonesia
Improving Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems in French-Speaking Countries: Opportunities and Challenges
Strengthening the Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) System in Colombia
Estimation of the direct and indirect costs attributable to alcohol consumption in Brazil
Guidance for Collection and Processing of Cause-of-Death Data in the Civil Registration and…
Vital Strategies: Reimagine Public Health
Public perceptions of emissions testing in Jakarta, Indonesia
Cost-Benefit Analysis for Air Pollution Control Strategies in Jakarta
Key Messages on Alcohol Harms and Policy Solutions